A Profound Political Statement

Individuals are not more prone to commit crime based on their union with a particular community ("race"), but in locations where rates of single-motherhood or drug use are high, such variables cause inhabitants of those locations to commit crime more often than inhabitants of other locations. In other words, individuals who inhabit a location conducive to crime are more likely to commit crime, and if one such location consists of a preponderance of a certain race, then of course a disparity will exist between members of different races. In other words, I am not suggesting that discrimination does not exist, but disparities do not imply discrimination.

Therefore, if there is a preponderance of members of the "black" race in one such location, then they will commit more crime than members of the "white" race in the same location, which necessitates a higher rate of criminal prosecution.

Therefore, the existence of the Black Lives Matter movement is not justified.

The issue of whether it is or is not the role of a government to bridge inequalities between communities or to assume the position of an arbiter of justice is a separate issue, but one that is more important.

Написано Tribune Aquila, 18.11.2019 at 20:23

Indeed people's crime rates is greatly affected by environment and community. But perhaps there may be ongoing cultural (perhaps not legal) discrimination, even if subtle, against blacks? Of course as a group they will be prosecuted more if there is a higher crime rate in that group; it's basic statistics. But just as the existence of a disparity does not necessarily imply discrimination, the existence of a disparity also cannot rule out the possibility of discrimination having an impact, even if slight. More research must be done to determine if such discrimination exists or not exists.

Написано Tribune Aquila, 18.11.2019 at 20:23

Individuals are not more prone to commit crime based on their union with a particular community ("race"), but in locations where rates of single-motherhood or drug use are high, such variables cause inhabitants of those locations to commit crime more often than inhabitants of other locations.

And why is single-motherhood and drug use higher in these communities? Why is it so much more prevalent among one race over another? Why is this common theme almost identical across different countries and continents and cultures? Why did dark age Arab philosophers comment on this exact culture in East Africa?

Is it the Democrats? No. There are many Democrat run states and areas with White majorities that don't have anything close to such a problem. There are many Republican states and cities with large black populations were this problem persists. It persists across economic lines. It's unexplainable with a colorblind perspective. The answer as to why is so starkly obvious.

Написано Tribune Aquila, 18.11.2019 at 20:23

In other words, individuals who inhabit a location conducive to crime are more likely to commit crime, and if one such location consists of a preponderance of a certain race, then of course a disparity will exist between members of different races.

It just happens to magically occur more in one particular ethnic community for no apparent reason, in Brazil, Venezuela, Britain, USA. It's just magic. It's unexplainable. Pure magic. Can't work out why, can't research why. It's just magic.

Написано Tribune Aquila, 18.11.2019 at 20:23

In other words, I am not suggesting that discrimination does not exist, but disparities do not imply discrimination.

The only ethnic group discriminated against by the state is White people. White people are also not a protected class. At no point have you ever talked about this. That fact alone exposes who you are.

Написано Tribune Aquila, 18.11.2019 at 20:23

Therefore, if there is a preponderance of members of the "black" race in one such location, then they will commit more crime than members of the "white" race in the same location, which necessitates a higher rate of criminal prosecution.

Same location, different conditions. It's magic. Can't explain it.

Написано Tribune Aquila, 18.11.2019 at 20:23

Therefore, the existence of the Black Lives Matter movement is not justified.

And all the institutions whole-hardheartedly supported it until it's leadership refused to break ties with Louis Farrakhan, leader of the Nation of Islam, who publically attacks.Jewish power over America. Then all the money and support just dissipated.

That's obviously just another one of those weird coincidences.

Написано Tribune Aquila, 18.11.2019 at 20:23

The issue of whether it is or is not the role of a government to bridge inequalities between communities or to assume the position of an arbiter of justice is a separate issue, but one that is more important.

Can we tackle the inequality between Jewish people and non-Jewish people? You seem quite keen to deal with black and white. Why not Jewish and non-Jewish? Or Jewish and White? There's quite a disparity there. Is that the result of discrimination and nepotism? If so, should this be tackled with state power?

The over representation of whites compared to blacks is almost infinitesimally small compared to the disparity between Jews and everyone else. Over a third of Harvard students at any given time are Jewish. That's a 1500% over representation. Harvard actively discriminates Whites who are under represented at Harvard. Surely, this is a greater issue to tackle? Actual legal state-enforced racial discrimination against Whites and an obviously illegal nepotism for Jewish students.

Surely, as an arbiter of Justice, Truth, Liberty and anti-discrimination, this would be a priority for you, Sean. Let's talk about it, shall we?

Написано Player 999, 19.11.2019 at 01:27

Indeed people's crime rates is greatly affected by environment and community. But perhaps there may be ongoing cultural (perhaps not legal) discrimination, even if subtle, against blacks?

Then why were these conditions far better when there was active state-enforced discrimination against blacks in the pre-1960's? If discrimination is the source, then these conditions should be better, not worse.

Написано Player 999, 19.11.2019 at 01:27

Of course as a group they will be prosecuted more if there is a higher crime rate in that group; it's basic statistics. But just as the existence of a disparity does not necessarily imply discrimination, the existence of a disparity also cannot rule out the possibility of discrimination having an impact, even if slight. More research must be done to determine if such discrimination exists or not exists.

Then the disparity between Jewish groups and non-Jewish groups should be paramount as this inequality is far wider and more prevalent. Like you said:

Написано Player 999, 19.11.2019 at 01:27

More research must be done to determine if such discrimination exists or not exists.

Why all the focus on black and white? Why no focus on Jewish and gentile? This disparity is far larger, far worse and far more disenfranchising then any other. It should be tacked first due to its size and scope.

Spicer: A Profound Political Statement

Цитировать:

"The disparity between Blacks and Whites is an issue that needs discussing for the 6,000,000th time, with blame automatically being assumed on Whites."

Tik-Tok: A Far, More Profound Political Statement

Цитировать:

"Why don't we discuss the disparity between Jews and Whites/Non-Jews?"

This response should be good. Are the clearly Jewish responders going to pick:

A) Jews have a strong culture built on education
Meanwhile, Whitey actually built all these educational institutions. Built Rome and shit. Founded the Modern World, but apparently we don't like education anymore.

B) Jews are incapable of discriminating due to Pogroms/Holocaust/ other kvetching's etc and their success is an example of striving against these odds
Yeah, because the Irish didn't get totally fucked over a table for the last few centuries and Jews totally didn't form a racial ethno-state for themselves and genocide their original inhabitants. This argument is not an excuse and not an argument.

OR

C) You're a Nahtzeee and I'm not responding to your obviously coherent response to my race-baiting thread designed to attack white peoples collective moral character
I suspect it might be C.

If disparities between whites and blacks is on the table, with the assumption of white guilt; I don't see why Jewish and gentile disparities can't be discussed, especially since they are far wider and problematic. If Whites are assumed to be the guilty partner in the disparity, does this not open the door to Jewish guilt for their disparity?

Написано Tik-Tok, 25.11.2019 at 17:03

The only ethnic group discriminated against by the state is White people.

Are you some sort of retard?

Написано King_Unleashed, 30.11.2019 at 17:06

Are you some sort of retard?

Are you? Affirmative Action, otherwise known as 'Positive Discrimination' is rife in academia, the public sector as well as the private sector. This allows for legal discrimination against white citizens. This discrimination is not applied against Jewish individuals who claim a privileged minority status. Nor are white people included as a 'protected class' when it comes to any legal discrimination and illegal discrimination. Whites are not protected by hate crime laws despite being the highest number of victims of interracial violence, abuse and legal discrimination.

Jewish non-profit organisations also receive over 90% of Homeland Security non-profit funding despite being the least likely to suffer any violence within their extremely segregated schools and communities, protected by private Jewish police forces called the 'Shomrim' who are supplied by the state. They even have private Jewish-only ambulances. Jewish students also make up around 30% of Harvard students. This is the most egregious example of over representation that cannot be possible unless blatant nepotism and discrimination against gentiles is occurring.

Calling me a 'retard' isn't an argument and you need address all of this. You will not, because you have no answer to this. The only state discrimination that currently occurs is directed at Whites, and the most privileged group are Jewish. Why is this not addressed?

Rat octogon

Написано Tribune Aquila, 18.11.2019 at 20:23

Individuals are not more prone to commit crime based on their union with a particular community ("race"), but in locations where rates of single-motherhood or drug use are high, such variables cause inhabitants of those locations to commit crime more often than inhabitants of other locations. In other words, individuals who inhabit a location conducive to crime are more likely to commit crime, and if one such location consists of a preponderance of a certain race, then of course a disparity will exist between members of different races. In other words, I am not suggesting that discrimination does not exist, but disparities do not imply discrimination.

Therefore, if there is a preponderance of members of the "black" race in one such location, then they will commit more crime than members of the "white" race in the same location, which necessitates a higher rate of criminal prosecution.

Therefore, the existence of the Black Lives Matter movement is not justified.

The issue of whether it is or is not the role of a government to bridge inequalities between communities or to assume the position of an arbiter of justice is a separate issue, but one that is more important.

I am starting to switch from hating this man for tolling to loving him for their political speeches