India is too overpowered

India is too overpowered guys maybe split it up ? united india is too overpowered only thing that can beat india is strong european contries with help of china i mean nerf india or unite another country like china . india is too overpowered atleast split it into 3 or 4 parts NERFFF

There were plans to split India before but they were torn apart.

If you don't really like to play with India though, you should stop playing 50k games.

Well India is strong and thats real.....

India is an SP machine it needs to be split

It also makes games really boring for other players

Stop playing 50k lol even in 25k india is irrelevant, this game doesn't cater to your single demographic.

India is fine,stop crying.

Improve your gameplay and you will have no problem.

PS:You can always ally him :s

China always beats India even in 50k in the long run

India is overpowered WE need to split it it makes gameplay for us low ranks a hell

With india it doesnot matter you get the most SP it is unfair for people who pick france uk , turkey ETC because they actually work and try hard

I can beat india with east asia in 50k

Написано LanRue, 30.04.2016 at 06:06

With india it doesnot matter you get the most SP it is unfair for people who pick france uk , turkey ETC because they actually work and try hard

Actually Europe is where the SP lies. In Asia, with India, its mostly conquering neutrals for the first 5 turns. In Europe, all the countries are close together. Since SP is earned in greater quantities by battling other players....

---

Plus, India can be beaten by a united Europe. Its economy is no match for Europe's. While the Europe guy will be using up almost all his reinforcements, India will be fumbling with 8-9 reinforcements just sitting around in various cities. Even with Imperialist.
Its an expensive country, with poor countries all around it, with a massive amount of reinforcements and not enough income.
In the short run, for expansion, its powerful. That power wanes pretty quick in middle and late-game.

---

Also, and importantly, don't play 50k or 25k games. Whether in world map, or presets, it has no skill and is more about who has more reinforcements....India, Turkey, than tactics.

---

World 50k is over-rated. It takes too much time, and doesn't give much SP in return since everyone just goes /pr alliance? to the closest, or highest ranked players

Написано Darth., 30.04.2016 at 08:23

Написано LanRue, 30.04.2016 at 06:06

With india it doesnot matter you get the most SP it is unfair for people who pick france uk , turkey ETC because they actually work and try hard

Actually Europe is where the SP lies. In Asia, with India, its mostly conquering neutrals for the first 5 turns. In Europe, all the countries are close together. Since SP is earned in greater quantities by battling other players....

---

Plus, India can be beaten by a united Europe. Its economy is no match for Europe's. While the Europe guy will be using up almost all his reinforcements, India will be fumbling with 8-9 reinforcements just sitting around in various cities. Even with Imperialist.
Its an expensive country, with poor countries all around it, with a massive amount of reinforcements and not enough income.
In the short run, for expansion, its powerful. That power wanes pretty quick in middle and late-game.

---

Also, and importantly, don't play 50k or 25k games. Whether in world map, or presets, it has no skill and is more about who has more reinforcements....India, Turkey, than tactics.

---

World 50k is over-rated. It takes too much time, and doesn't give much SP in return since everyone just goes /pr alliance? to the closest, or highest ranked players

you have a point

Rank 5 telling people something is over powered.
Get gud kid

Ok duel me you pick india

I understand that i shouldnot play world 50k if i dont like india but waht about newcomers? and newbies? when newbies play world 50k someone definetely wins as india and that india ranks up but the rest of newbies that played that world 50k wont should atwar say to all newbies to not play world 50k? NO and then those newbies will leave and noone new will join . does atwar not want new players?

What point i am making here is that united india = no new players and more noobs

Написано LanRue, 01.05.2016 at 07:12

I understand that i shouldnot play world 50k if i dont like india but waht about newcomers? and newbies? when newbies play world 50k someone definetely wins as india and that india ranks up but the rest of newbies that played that world 50k wont should atwar say to all newbies to not play world 50k? NO and then those newbies will leave and noone new will join . does atwar not want new players?

What point i am making here is that united india = no new players and more noobs

Yeah, no.
If a noob joins as India, they don't win, they go bankrupt. Tank spam, bomber spam etc etc will send the cash into negatives pretty fast. Then they go /pr ally pls?

Eh darth you are making some valid points

India gets bankrupt if he can't expand to china, therefore a china player is the main enemy for the indian one. If india takes china he will have great income and reinf, controlling the whole continent. Utopia.
In my opinion the problem is that china is just stronger than india, after the 2nd week at least, having a much greater income. Any decent SM china player will win 1v1 vs india in 50k world.
Take into account that no india will go full attack on china, unless proven noob, since india is forced to expand west and north (arabia+iran t3, siberia t4 at Last) if he wants to have some chances of winning the game after china's defeat. Playing 2 fronts is hard.

If u split up india china becomes OP

What about japan ? can a decent japan player win against china or india?

Написано LanRue, 02.05.2016 at 13:23

What about japan ? can a decent japan player win against china or india?

South Korea can win against China if well played. It's safe to say Japan can too. Of course this is if China isn't united as one under a single player. China's expensive, South Korea's cheap while Japan is very rich. Go SM and spam bombers as South Korea.
For Japan, go NC and use OP destroyers to snipe the Chinese coastal capitals. Non-nerfed infantry, and 20 capacity naval transports with the range of an air trans are the icing on the cake.
I know some people say NC is a troll strategy like LB, but....
To give you an example of the power of NC, in an Europe 5K game, select Ireland as your starting country, and build all reinforcements (usually 6 or 7) as destroyers. Since with NC destroyers have 1 capacity, pile in all the infantries provided by the game, and attack London. You'll lose about 3 destroyers. Next turn, build a transport, and pile in the surviving infantries, spam tanks and take Paris + Nantes (Nantes possible with extra cities toggled only, but still a bit risky). Use the remaining destroyers and split them between protecting your capital, and taking Netherlands. Use the free militias in London (usually 13 are given) to take Birmingham, and throw in an extra infantry for good luck.
Works like a charm everytime.

Japan is maybe the richest pick in the area.. Talking about 50k games, 1v1 against india would see india overwhelming it: India can reach south east asia and/or west/south china (=money) before Japan because of the distance.

I think Japan vs China south is kinda balanced, while in Japan vs China Southeast the latter has advantage, locking japanese expansion. I wouldn't pick south korea in 50k games.

If there are 3 players: one in india, one in china, one in Japan, and all of them fight each other, China gets sandwiched, and Japan dies outnumbered by mighty india. Definetly, if u like to go alone in your matches you should pick india, quite risky at the beginning (depending on other picks) but once removed chinas and controlling all asia no one willstop you

Написано Darth., 30.04.2016 at 08:23

Написано LanRue, 30.04.2016 at 06:06

With india it doesnot matter you get the most SP it is unfair for people who pick france uk , turkey ETC because they actually work and try hard

Actually Europe is where the SP lies. In Asia, with India, its mostly conquering neutrals for the first 5 turns. In Europe, all the countries are close together. Since SP is earned in greater quantities by battling other players....

---

Plus, India can be beaten by a united Europe. Its economy is no match for Europe's. While the Europe guy will be using up almost all his reinforcements, India will be fumbling with 8-9 reinforcements just sitting around in various cities. Even with Imperialist.
Its an expensive country, with poor countries all around it, with a massive amount of reinforcements and not enough income.
In the short run, for expansion, its powerful. That power wanes pretty quick in middle and late-game.

---

Also, and importantly, don't play 50k or 25k games. Whether in world map, or presets, it has no skill and is more about who has more reinforcements....India, Turkey, than tactics.

---

World 50k is over-rated. It takes too much time, and doesn't give much SP in return since everyone just goes /pr alliance? to the closest, or highest ranked players

World 50k does require a lot of skills and micromamagement.Not all players do ally.And the one who gets more reinfs doesnt win.Its like picking in europe 10k.If player A picks UK and Player B picks belgium player B will die.Soooo does that mean according to your logic that europe 10k is noob? Back to the original post instead of crying to the forums go get some skills and beat india.India isnt op its economy is shit and goes broke turn 5.

Написано Nations, 03.05.2016 at 02:35

Написано Darth., 30.04.2016 at 08:23

Написано LanRue, 30.04.2016 at 06:06

With india it doesnot matter you get the most SP it is unfair for people who pick france uk , turkey ETC because they actually work and try hard

Actually Europe is where the SP lies. In Asia, with India, its mostly conquering neutrals for the first 5 turns. In Europe, all the countries are close together. Since SP is earned in greater quantities by battling other players....

---

Plus, India can be beaten by a united Europe. Its economy is no match for Europe's. While the Europe guy will be using up almost all his reinforcements, India will be fumbling with 8-9 reinforcements just sitting around in various cities. Even with Imperialist.
Its an expensive country, with poor countries all around it, with a massive amount of reinforcements and not enough income.
In the short run, for expansion, its powerful. That power wanes pretty quick in middle and late-game.

---

Also, and importantly, don't play 50k or 25k games. Whether in world map, or presets, it has no skill and is more about who has more reinforcements....India, Turkey, than tactics.

---

World 50k is over-rated. It takes too much time, and doesn't give much SP in return since everyone just goes /pr alliance? to the closest, or highest ranked players

World 50k does require a lot of skills and micromamagement.Not all players do ally.And the one who gets more reinfs doesnt win.Its like picking in europe 10k.If player A picks UK and Player B picks belgium player B will die.Soooo does that mean according to your logic that europe 10k is noob? Back to the original post instead of crying to the forums go get some skills and beat india.India isnt op its economy is shit and goes broke turn 5.

Are you an idiot? Did you read my above posts? I just said India isn't OP and said the same thing about its economy.
Nor did I say a game depends on number of units. And just saying, all players may not ally in main, but in beginners where Rue plays, everyone does ally to the Rank 5s and 6s and the people closest to them.

You are right when i play begginers and when i unite china in the first turn with blitz people go crazy and ally me

India is only good if u get China..........

Написано Darth., 30.04.2016 at 08:23

World 50k is over-rated. It takes too much time, and doesn't give much SP in return since everyone just goes /pr alliance? to the closest, or highest ranked players

How many times do i have to say this?
World 50k is the hardest gameplay if you dont ally.

I am bored to hear all of you who play eu and scenario say that 50k world is for noobs,allyfags and it requires no skill.

Well lets put you all in a world 50k match and then lets tell who is the noob..

Написано Cold Case, 03.05.2016 at 04:29

Написано Darth., 30.04.2016 at 08:23

World 50k is over-rated. It takes too much time, and doesn't give much SP in return since everyone just goes /pr alliance? to the closest, or highest ranked players

How many times do i have to say this?
World 50k is the hardest gameplay if you dont ally.

I am bored to hear all of you who play eu and scenario say that 50k world is for noobs,allyfags and it requires no skill.

Well lets put you all in a world 50k match and then lets tell who is the noob..

I never said its for noobs. Its just that it takes too long, for comparitively little gain and there are a lot of allyfags in it, you can't deny that. Reducing number of alliances is an option, but then secret alliances crop up. I've not played World 50k in a long time, and never in main, but in beginners I've described it how I experienced it.
Plus, this post was made by a rank 5 who doesn't play in main window, as far as I know. Never seen him there, but always in beginners.

Написано Darth., 30.04.2016 at 08:23

it has no skill and is more about who has more reinforcements....India, Turkey, than tactics.

Написано Cold Case, 03.05.2016 at 06:38

Написано Darth., 30.04.2016 at 08:23

it has no skill and is more about who has more reinforcements....India, Turkey, than tactics.

An exaggeration, but there is a lot more bomber and tank spam in 50k games. You don't have to worry about economy except if you're India, or starting in a poor place like Africa.