I have a question

Could someone explain me, how did AtWar attract only some anti-democratic players. Reading those topics nowadays, if we would compare real world with AtWar community, 90% of the world would be against democracy... What did they find in AtWar?

AW is small community so everyones opinion is heard.In community it doesnt aplly that everyone can fully express his opinion because he is scared or he is the minority.In AW community is a closed socaite where its easy to be heard.I like AW because it is small and is really intresting to read those people opinion.They atleast express it and dont be the shy bitches like in real life where 1 shouts something and all go behind him

Написано JUGERS2, 22.01.2018 at 09:11

AW is small community so everyones opinion is heard.In community it doesnt aplly that everyone can fully express his opinion because he is scared or he is the minority.In AW community is a closed socaite where its easy to be heard.I like AW because it is small and is really intresting to read those people opinion.They atleast express it and dont be the shy bitches like in real life where 1 shouts something and all go behind him

Again, this should in some way represent small world, so there should be small amount of anti-democrats, not like this.

Counterculture bullshit.
Every generation, the popular ideology is flipped because the newer generation wants to be cool and rebel againsts the past generation.

Unless your parents brainwashed you since birth, it is very likely you will end up with different views from them.

Well its a war-strategy based game afterall

D

Написано Waffel, 22.01.2018 at 12:35

Well its a war-strategy based game afterall

D

Most ultra right wing players are roleplayer noobs or just suck at the game

Very rare to find one that doesnt die in 3 turns.

You'd be surprised with the anti-democratic feeling that is within western civilized societies that hold Democracy as a value. People don't feel any empathy for the political regime that is democracy because it's distant from them.

(I'm not anti-democratic at all but I'm not a fanatic for democracy, fanatism always leads to decay)

Написано Witch-Doctor, 22.01.2018 at 12:32

Unless your parents brainwashed you since birth, it is very likely you will end up with different views from them.

After one good generation, 2nd generation sucks, that's what happens to Western world or?

Were at Generation 3 atm

Написано Oleg, 22.01.2018 at 14:14

Написано Witch-Doctor, 22.01.2018 at 12:32

Unless your parents brainwashed you since birth, it is very likely you will end up with different views from them.

After one good generation, 2nd generation sucks, that's what happens to Western world or?

The ww2 generation in america is refered to as the best generation. Their kids, the baby boomers are arguably the worst generation of americans.

Написано Witch-Doctor, 22.01.2018 at 14:20

Написано Oleg, 22.01.2018 at 14:14

Написано Witch-Doctor, 22.01.2018 at 12:32

Unless your parents brainwashed you since birth, it is very likely you will end up with different views from them.

After one good generation, 2nd generation sucks, that's what happens to Western world or?

The ww2 generation in america is refered to as the best generation. Their kids, the baby boomers are arguably the worst generation of americans.

Dude, Americans are made of worst European generation. Worst people that were outsiders of community migrated to America...

Написано Witch-Doctor, 22.01.2018 at 14:20

Написано Oleg, 22.01.2018 at 14:14

Написано Witch-Doctor, 22.01.2018 at 12:32

Unless your parents brainwashed you since birth, it is very likely you will end up with different views from them.

After one good generation, 2nd generation sucks, that's what happens to Western world or?

The ww2 generation in america is refered to as the best generation. Their kids, the baby boomers are arguably the worst generation of americans.

The Baby Boomers gave Rise to the even more Horrid Generation (Mine the Millenials) luckily the next generation has much potential

Написано Oleg, 22.01.2018 at 09:05

Could someone explain me, how did AtWar attract only some anti-democratic players. Reading those topics nowadays, if we would compare real world with AtWar community, 90% of the world would be against democracy... What did they find in AtWar?

Can you give some suggestions? Have you ever considered that democracy is an umbrella term, and there are diferent forms, and that possibly your ideology puts more emphasis on certain ideas while some put there's on others? It's almost as if our individual experiances shape our opinions.

For example, I do not care about the majority, I do not care for the sick or the poor, not because I am evil or miniacal but because I believe every individual is responsible for there own actions and circumstances, and should be held accountable for such. I believe death is a natural end to those who biology do not let them prosper as is seen in nature, with any other species. Our epathy and our humanity tells us to protect those people, which is a noble goal, but then there are those who take advantage of us, they then go on to reproduce and continue to pass on a failed genetic sequence further deluding our species.

I say this as it can be taken out of context as undemocratic, but that's why I started with my previous point. It's all about context and personal beliefs. I want to see humanity prosper and everyone live happy lives, but that will become increasingly impossible as we aid those that other wise mother nature would have reclaimed.

Написано Helly, 22.01.2018 at 14:48

Написано Oleg, 22.01.2018 at 09:05

Could someone explain me, how did AtWar attract only some anti-democratic players. Reading those topics nowadays, if we would compare real world with AtWar community, 90% of the world would be against democracy... What did they find in AtWar?

Can you give some suggestions? Have you ever considered that democracy is an umbrella term, and there are diferent forms, and that possibly your ideology puts more emphasis on certain ideas while some put there's on others? It's almost as if our individual experiances shape our opinions.

For example, I do not care about the majority, I do not care for the sick or the poor, not because I am evil or miniacal but because I believe every individual is responsible for there own actions and circumstances, and should be held accountable for such. I believe death is a natural end to those who biology do not let them prosper as is seen in nature, with any other species. Our epathy and our humanity tells us to protect those people, which is a noble goal, but then there are those who take advantage of us, they then go on to reproduce and continue to pass on a failed genetic sequence further deluding our species.

I say this as it can be taken out of context as undemocratic, but that's why I started with my previous point. It's all about context and personal beliefs. I want to see humanity prosper and everyone live happy lives, but that will become increasingly impossible as we aid those that other wise mother nature

would have reclaimed.

With your logic, if some crazy hobo stabbed you on the streets and you died, then you are inferior to the hobo because your genetics isnt good enough to survive.

Написано Witch-Doctor, 22.01.2018 at 15:00

Написано Helly, 22.01.2018 at 14:48

Написано Oleg, 22.01.2018 at 09:05

Could someone explain me, how did AtWar attract only some anti-democratic players. Reading those topics nowadays, if we would compare real world with AtWar community, 90% of the world would be against democracy... What did they find in AtWar?

Can you give some suggestions? Have you ever considered that democracy is an umbrella term, and there are diferent forms, and that possibly your ideology puts more emphasis on certain ideas while some put there's on others? It's almost as if our individual experiances shape our opinions.

For example, I do not care about the majority, I do not care for the sick or the poor, not because I am evil or miniacal but because I believe every individual is responsible for there own actions and circumstances, and should be held accountable for such. I believe death is a natural end to those who biology do not let them prosper as is seen in nature, with any other species. Our epathy and our humanity tells us to protect those people, which is a noble goal, but then there are those who take advantage of us, they then go on to reproduce and continue to pass on a failed genetic sequence further deluding our species.

I say this as it can be taken out of context as undemocratic, but that's why I started with my previous point. It's all about context and personal beliefs. I want to see humanity prosper and everyone live happy lives, but that will become increasingly impossible as we aid those that other wise mother nature

would have reclaimed.

With your logic, if some crazy hobo stabbed you on the streets and you died, then you are inferior to the hobo because your genetics isnt good enough to survive.

That is correct, and it would not be fair or just, but it happened. But hopefully I'd shoot him first, but like I said the world ain't fair or perfect.

Написано Helly, 22.01.2018 at 15:07

Написано Witch-Doctor, 22.01.2018 at 15:00

Написано Helly, 22.01.2018 at 14:48

Написано Oleg, 22.01.2018 at 09:05

Could someone explain me, how did AtWar attract only some anti-democratic players. Reading those topics nowadays, if we would compare real world with AtWar community, 90% of the world would be against democracy... What did they find in AtWar?

Can you give some suggestions? Have you ever considered that democracy is an umbrella term, and there are diferent forms, and that possibly your ideology puts more emphasis on certain ideas while some put there's on others? It's almost as if our individual experiances shape our opinions.

For example, I do not care about the majority, I do not care for the sick or the poor, not because I am evil or miniacal but because I believe every individual is responsible for there own actions and circumstances, and should be held accountable for such. I believe death is a natural end to those who biology do not let them prosper as is seen in nature, with any other species. Our epathy and our humanity tells us to protect those people, which is a noble goal, but then there are those who take advantage of us, they then go on to reproduce and continue to pass on a failed genetic sequence further deluding our species.

I say this as it can be taken out of context as undemocratic, but that's why I started with my previous point. It's all about context and personal beliefs. I want to see humanity prosper and everyone live happy lives, but that will become increasingly impossible as we aid those that other wise mother nature

would have reclaimed.

With your logic, if some crazy hobo stabbed you on the streets and you died, then you are inferior to the hobo because your genetics isnt good enough to survive.

That is correct, and it would not be fair or just, but it happened. But hopefully I'd shoot him first, but like I said the world ain't fair or perfect.

No it isn't correct because the whole idea of eugenics is pseudoscience.

Eugenics is what the nobles of europe argued about the commoners and criminals who they casted away. The nobles argued that nothing great would ever amount from them because they are not of noble birth.

If that was the case, Australia and the United States would have never risen.

Написано Witch-Doctor, 22.01.2018 at 15:17

Написано Helly, 22.01.2018 at 15:07

Написано Witch-Doctor, 22.01.2018 at 15:00

Написано Helly, 22.01.2018 at 14:48

Написано Oleg, 22.01.2018 at 09:05

Could someone explain me, how did AtWar attract only some anti-democratic players. Reading those topics nowadays, if we would compare real world with AtWar community, 90% of the world would be against democracy... What did they find in AtWar?

Can you give some suggestions? Have you ever considered that democracy is an umbrella term, and there are diferent forms, and that possibly your ideology puts more emphasis on certain ideas while some put there's on others? It's almost as if our individual experiances shape our opinions.

For example, I do not care about the majority, I do not care for the sick or the poor, not because I am evil or miniacal but because I believe every individual is responsible for there own actions and circumstances, and should be held accountable for such. I believe death is a natural end to those who biology do not let them prosper as is seen in nature, with any other species. Our epathy and our humanity tells us to protect those people, which is a noble goal, but then there are those who take advantage of us, they then go on to reproduce and continue to pass on a failed genetic sequence further deluding our species.

I say this as it can be taken out of context as undemocratic, but that's why I started with my previous point. It's all about context and personal beliefs. I want to see humanity prosper and everyone live happy lives, but that will become increasingly impossible as we aid those that other wise mother nature

would have reclaimed.

With your logic, if some crazy hobo stabbed you on the streets and you died, then you are inferior to the hobo because your genetics isnt good enough to survive.

That is correct, and it would not be fair or just, but it happened. But hopefully I'd shoot him first, but like I said the world ain't fair or perfect.

No it isn't correct because the whole idea of eugenics is pseudoscience.

Eugenics is what the nobles of europe argued about the commoners and criminals who they casted away. The nobles argued that nothing great would ever amount from them because they are not of noble birth.

If that was the case, Australia and the United States would have never risen.

I never said any of that, I said people are accountable for there own actions, and are not or never will be societies responsibility. Stop cherry picking my posts and trying to twist my meanings, and form a coherent arguement.

Just ignore list this fucking idiot hell i have him in ignore since 4 years he is very retarded even as a teen you are not going anywhere listening to him he also sucks at this game ever since i met him and rages at who calls him noob

Написано SyrianDevil, 22.01.2018 at 15:21

Just ignore list this fucking idiot hell i have him in ignore since 4 years he is very retarded even as a teen you are not going anywhere listening to him he also sucks at this game ever since i met him and rages at who calls him noob

If you had me muted for four years how did you read this post? But yes please ignore me so you can stop reading my posts.

Написано Oleg, 22.01.2018 at 09:05

Could someone explain me, how did AtWar attract only some anti-democratic players. Reading those topics nowadays, if we would compare real world with AtWar community, 90% of the world would be against democracy... What did they find in AtWar?

Because atwar people are smart

You think this is democracy nowdays? lol

So much umbrella comments in here.
I wanted answer on my question, not your opinions on democracy.

Написано AlBoZzZ, 22.01.2018 at 20:33

You think this is democracy nowdays? lol

I have never heard of someone who paid and lied in order to be allowed to live in dictatorship

Написано Oleg, 23.01.2018 at 07:48

So much umbrella comments in here.
I wanted answer on my question, not your opinions on democracy.

Right wingers tend to be stubborn and therefore they spend more efforts to protect their opinion and try to spread it. it's not uncommon to see political thread with 50 players viewing and only 3 debating each other

Also community tends to be toxic and insult these who disagree. and when you consider the long long debates including endless replies you can understand why people choose to stay out of it.

Plus some right wingers tend to be manipulative during debates so people don't bother argue with them.

DEMOCRACY IS BULLSHIT.

Can't ever work properly, same as communism.

People who believe in equality and justice of democracy are in the bigger fallacy than Tito is whole his life.

Написано Croat, 23.01.2018 at 08:20

Can't ever work properly, same as communism.

People who believe in equality and justice of democracy are in the bigger fallacy than Tito is whole his life.[/b][/size]

I don't mind being poorer than i could be under "smart dictator" regime. people who protect democratic routine and civil rights are more precious than any feeling of betrayal or national pride.

Give your ass for an army for a year and then tell me you do not adore democracy

Besides, putting aside his bad hobby of trolling Tito is kinda nice person

Написано Seranox, 22.01.2018 at 14:29

Написано Witch-Doctor, 22.01.2018 at 14:20

Написано Oleg, 22.01.2018 at 14:14

Написано Witch-Doctor, 22.01.2018 at 12:32

Unless your parents brainwashed you since birth, it is very likely you will end up with different views from them.

After one good generation, 2nd generation sucks, that's what happens to Western world or?

The ww2 generation in america is refered to as the best generation. Their kids, the baby boomers are arguably the worst generation of americans.

The Baby Boomers gave Rise to the even more Horrid Generation (Mine the Millenials) luckily the next generation has much potential

Your forgetting about gen x

Написано Croat, 23.01.2018 at 08:20

DEMOCRACY IS BULLSHIT.

Can't ever work properly, same as communism.

People who believe in equality and justice of democracy are in the bigger fallacy than Tito is whole his life.

KOLINDA IS LOVE KOLINA IS LIFE!!!! KOLINDA FOR DICTATOR!!!

Написано Oleg, 23.01.2018 at 15:32

Написано Croat, 23.01.2018 at 08:20

DEMOCRACY IS BULLSHIT.

Can't ever work properly, same as communism.

People who believe in equality and justice of democracy are in the bigger fallacy than Tito is whole his life.

KOLINDA IS LOVE KOLINA IS LIFE!!!! KOLINDA FOR DICTATOR!!!

The milf? I'd let her start another balkan genocide every day