|
Написано Boros, 06.01.2018 at 17:08
I think imperialist is a little under powered
you rank 10 ?
----
No such thing as a good girl, you are just not the right guy.
Загрузка...
Загрузка...
|
|
¿Por qué no hay foros en español?
Загрузка...
Загрузка...
|
|
¿Por qué no hay foros en español?
we no hablos de español/french
----
Our next Moments are Tomorrows Memories
Загрузка...
Загрузка...
|
|
¿Por qué no hay foros en español?
Porque hay muchas personas de distintas nacionalidades y por lo tanto, idiomas, así que todos hablamos en inglés por ser el idioma universal...
Pero hay foros internacionales en los que puedes hablar según tu idioma, aquí te dejo el link del foro español (idioma) https://es.atwar-game.com/forum/board.php?board_id=217
Загрузка...
Загрузка...
|
|
Написано Boros, 06.01.2018 at 17:08
I think imperialist is a little under powered
Imperialist is one of the best strats in the game
----
The enemy is in front of us, the enemy is behind us, the enemy is to the right and left of us. They cant get away this time! - General Douglas Mcarthur
Загрузка...
Загрузка...
|
|
Написано Boros, 06.01.2018 at 17:08
I think imperialist is a little under powered
Imperialist is one of the best strats in the game
There aren't very many though
Загрузка...
Загрузка...
|
|
So, what's the status?
----
Embrace the void
Загрузка...
Загрузка...
|
|
+1 range for IF militia is desperately needed
----
i think i might be hairbags - zizou
Загрузка...
Загрузка...
|
|
Написано Boros, 06.01.2018 at 17:08
I think imperialist is a little under powered
imperialist can be used on almost any map effectively.. it is a very good strategy
----
i think i might be hairbags - zizou
Загрузка...
Загрузка...
|
|
I think that there is a need to give helis +1 capacity (infantry or marine) in sky menace.
Загрузка...
Загрузка...
|
|
Naval Commander Destroyers should be destroyed☺
Загрузка...
Загрузка...
|
Galerius Аккаунт удален |
+1 range to militia with IF
-1 att and -1 def to hells in DS (too op)
Загрузка...
Загрузка...
|
|
Remove hw marines def penalties, 110 tanks, 150 subs. You're welcome
Загрузка...
Загрузка...
|
|
Remove hw marines def penalties, 110 tanks, 150 subs. You're welcome
nope. hw already op as it is.
Загрузка...
Загрузка...
|
Galerius Аккаунт удален |
I think it's absolutely necessary to at least give 1 range to milicia in IF otherwise u cannot even empty a city without using a trans, which makes it really not convenient.
Загрузка...
Загрузка...
|
|
Написано Guest, 10.01.2018 at 02:12
+1 range to militia with IF
-1 att and -1 def to hells in DS (too op)
This
Загрузка...
Загрузка...
|
|
Написано Guest, 10.01.2018 at 02:12
+1 range to militia with IF
-1 att and -1 def to hells in DS (too op)
This
----
Загрузка...
Загрузка...
|
|
Загрузка...
Загрузка...
|
|
I actually agree with lao's suggestions (and with his comeback to strat changing, popularly called strat crying topics )
I would suggest few more changes too:
Master of Stealth:
-50 cost for marines (take care, it is currently -40)
-110 cost for stealth (currently -100)
-50 cost for Air Transport
Let's be real, it would not change anything drastically, but I think that it will balance mos more with other strategies, since mos is one of the weakest strategies.
Desert Storm:
I would personally be more radical:
-2 defence to helicopters.
We had enough of this cancerous anti-balance strategy, time to balance it. Helicopters with this strategy have nearly the same defence as infantry, and double attack, plus they are destroying infantry and militia... How is it balanced?
Second suggestion is changing the price of helicopters:
-20 cost (currently -40)
GW:
Oh wow, didn't even know it was skipped, shush....
Time to really shrink to fit strategies that were abused because they were unbalanced (DS and GW) and balance them out with the others.
Загрузка...
Загрузка...
|
|
Написано Oleg, 19.01.2018 at 07:55
I actually agree with lao's suggestions (and with his comeback to strat changing, popularly called strat crying topics )
I would suggest few more changes too:
Master of Stealth:
-50 cost for marines (take care, it is currently -40)
-110 cost for stealth (currently -100)
-50 cost for Air Transport
Let's be real, it would not change anything drastically, but I think that it will balance mos more with other strategies, since mos is one of the weakest strategies.
Desert Storm:
I would personally be more radical:
-2 defence to helicopters.
We had enough of this cancerous anti-balance strategy, time to balance it. Helicopters with this strategy have nearly the same defence as infantry, and double attack, plus they are destroying infantry and militia... How is it balanced?
Second suggestion is changing the price of helicopters:
-20 cost (currently -40)
GW:
Oh wow, didn't even know it was skipped, shush....
Time to really shrink to fit strategies that were abused because they were unbalanced (DS and GW) and balance them out with the others.
Agree with MoS.Dissagree with DS:If ds gets nefed no one would go sm ukr again...gc/gw and even pd are supirior.
Also yes nerf gw,Maybe like cost nerf not stats one.
----
Загрузка...
Загрузка...
|
|
Написано JUGERS2, 19.01.2018 at 07:58
Agree with MoS.Dissagree with DS:If ds gets nefed no one would go sm ukr again...gc/gw and even pd are supirior.
Also yes nerf gw,Maybe like cost nerf not stats one.
What?
Загрузка...
Загрузка...
|
|
If you remove the HW inf attack nerf, it would make HW expansion and gameplay much stronger.
Загрузка...
Загрузка...
|
|
Imp -50 cost -1 atrack -1defence. The idea being cheaper units poorer ability.
----
We are not the same- I am a Martian.
Загрузка...
Загрузка...
|
|
Написано Helly, 27.01.2018 at 23:29
Imp -50 cost -1 atrack -1defence. The idea being cheaper units poorer ability.
Βad idea imp is fine as it is.
Загрузка...
Загрузка...
|
|
I personally agree with blitz buff,ds nerf,lb nerf,mos balance,if buff and remove gw marines def bonus against inf.Rest are fine as they are.
Загрузка...
Загрузка...
|
|
Gw needs a nerf in the same direction as DS was nerfed a year ago.
-1 defense to milita, the marine def bonus is too minor for a nerf.
----
''Everywhere where i am absent, they commit nothing but follies''
~Napoleon
Загрузка...
Загрузка...
|
|
Написано 4nic, 28.01.2018 at 08:02
Gw needs a nerf in the same direction as DS was nerfed a year ago.
-1 defense to milita, the marine def bonus is too minor for a nerf.
gw is is no way op,a good t3 or t4 rush can kill a good gw ukr,i have also lost in late game as gw.
Загрузка...
Загрузка...
|
|
Sometimes I feel like you guys try to nerf every strat expect PD.Pls focus in strats that really need a nerf such as DS and stop trying to make good strats shit like you did with blitz.
Загрузка...
Загрузка...
|
Gal Аккаунт удален |
Написано Nations, 28.01.2018 at 14:22
Sometimes I feel like you guys try to nerf every strat expect PD.Pls focus in strats that really need a nerf such as DS and stop trying to make good strats shit like you did with blitz.
DS needs a nerf, obviously.
Загрузка...
Загрузка...
|
|
Time to talk about an LB nerf. There are so many screenshots of insane lb rolls floating around so i dont think i need to repost them. Instead lets talk about the strat itself.
The strat has been continually boosted since its original nerf from +15 crit back in 2011/2012. Almost all the strats have seen boosts since that time and we are now at +13 crit as well as having the cost nerfs to the infantry and militia removed. We've gone too far and need to take a step back. The strategies primary units are militia, inf, tanks and transports. It boasts close to pd defence and ironfist attack without the range nerfs. The only nerfs on the strat are to its tanks and transports. This is not enough given all the benefits. So lets talk about what nerf we should add.
Personally I am favouring restoring +10 cost to infantry. Opinions/other suggestions?
----
Загрузка...
Загрузка...
|