Froyer "rewaller" poulette

Let it be known
that this scared bum froyer asked me 3 things before the mod sanctioned death duel
loser deletes, no serbwall, no rewalls

then this little frenchie decides to rewall when i have 30 if tanks at the gate with 10 more coming because he is scared like a chicken



IMAGINE MAKING YOUR OWN RULES

THEN REWALLING

OH NO NO NO NO NO NO NO

FROYER THE ONLY THING YOU KILLED TODAY WAS YOUR OWN CREDIBILITY YOU REWALLING BUM

HAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHA

90 day forum ban.

Its okay you won the story. A mod deleted his duel now he will cry like a dirty chicken.

Bro the only guy that are voting for rewall are illy fags, haters, players that think im hacking so immo fags, and random noobs that dont know what a rewall is.

Написано Froyer, 06.05.2020 at 15:22

Bro the only guy that are voting for rewall are illy fags, haters, players that think im hacking so immo fags, and random noobs that dont know what a rewall is.

Написано Froyer, 06.05.2020 at 15:22

Bro the only guy that are voting for rewall are illy fags, haters, players that think im hacking so immo fags, and random noobs that dont know what a rewall is.

"the only people who vote against me is everyone"

Написано Froyer, 06.05.2020 at 15:33

"WHY WON'T ANYONE LOVE ME?!?!?!?!?"

*rewalls*

Cool

Написано Froyer, 06.05.2020 at 15:33

Fuck off rewaller

Написано BLACKMETAL3199, 06.05.2020 at 15:23

Написано Froyer, 06.05.2020 at 15:22

Bro the only guy that are voting for rewall are illy fags, haters, players that think im hacking so immo fags, and random noobs that dont know what a rewall is.

Hey master tengri of LoL and Italy

Rewall, what other.

Написано boywind2, 06.05.2020 at 15:16

Let it be known
that this scared bum froyer asked me 3 things before the mod sanctioned death duel
loser deletes, no serbwall, no rewalls

then this little frenchie decides to rewall when i have 30 if tanks at the gate with 10 more coming because he is scared like a chicken



IMAGINE MAKING YOUR OWN RULES

THEN REWALLING

OH NO NO NO NO NO NO NO

FROYER THE ONLY THING YOU KILLED TODAY WAS YOUR OWN CREDIBILITY YOU REWALLING BUM

HAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHA

Turk isn't walled. It's not a rewall. Wf twice next time. clovis and 4nic will tell you that's not a rewall.

Been saying this guy cheats for a long time now, I am not even surprised he rewalls. As soon as he is backed into a corner he rips something out of his loose asshole.

If you remove any wall and place any new wall in it's location, that's rewalling. This is 100% a rewall

Написано Lelouch., 06.05.2020 at 16:40

Написано boywind2, 06.05.2020 at 15:16

Let it be known
that this scared bum froyer asked me 3 things before the mod sanctioned death duel
loser deletes, no serbwall, no rewalls

then this little frenchie decides to rewall when i have 30 if tanks at the gate with 10 more coming because he is scared like a chicken



IMAGINE MAKING YOUR OWN RULES

THEN REWALLING

OH NO NO NO NO NO NO NO

FROYER THE ONLY THING YOU KILLED TODAY WAS YOUR OWN CREDIBILITY YOU REWALLING BUM

HAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHA

Turk isn't walled. It's not a rewall. Wf twice next time. clovis and 4nic will tell you that's not a rewall.

Yes it's a rewall. Just because the old wall wasnt closed or the new wall isnt closed doesnt mean it isnt a rewall.

Написано Witch-Doctor, 06.05.2020 at 18:04

If you remove any wall and place any new wall in it's location, that's rewalling. This is 100% a rewall

Rewalling is when you remove a cap wall and make a new cap wall in its place. For it to be rewalling, the cap wall has to be fully walled the turn before and the fully walled in the turn after. Note that if the wall in question is a big wall that fully walls the cap, then it's fine to make another bigwall in it's place so long as you're not fully walling a country. In other words, you should be able to spam a new wall anywhere on the map each turn so long as it doesn't fully wall a country.

The reason why this definition of a rewall makes sense is because it avoids any and all potential misunderstands that could arise from a rewalling case in question, while also allowing players to replace a wall that's either unfavorable or inconvenient to them. What do I mean by this?

Case 1) Your opponent wfs your cap and it's not fully walled. The player should be allowed to remove the units used to attempt to make a wall and try walling it again the following turn.You shouldn't be forced to have to use part of the attempted wall that's still intact in order to attempt to make a new one.

Case 2) Your wall gets in the way of your movement. This is a common case in situations involving a wall and a water shortcut. If we're talking about a wall that walls a city, as long as you're not making a brand new wall with new units that fully walls the city in its place, you should be allowed to move the wall.

I understand that there's a lot of controversy surrounding the definition of a rewall, because a lot of players don't agree on ONE definition. However, this is just the definition that I agree with because it's the one that I find the most fair.

Написано Lelouch., 06.05.2020 at 18:43

Написано Witch-Doctor, 06.05.2020 at 18:04

If you remove any wall and place any new wall in it's location, that's rewalling. This is 100% a rewall

Rewalling is when you remove a cap wall and make a new cap wall in its place. For it to be rewalling, the cap wall has to be fully walled the turn before and the fully walled in the turn after. Note that if the wall in question is a big wall that fully walls the cap, then it's fine to make another bigwall in it's place so long as you're not fully walling a country. In other words, you should be able to spam a new wall anywhere on the map each turn so long as it doesn't fully wall a country.

The reason why this definition of a rewall makes sense is because it avoids any and all potential misunderstands that could arise from a rewalling case in question, while also allowing players to replace a wall that's either unfavorable or inconvenient to them. What do I mean by this?

Case 1) Your opponent wfs your cap and it's not fully walled. The player should be allowed to remove the units used to attempt to make a wall and try walling it again the following turn.You shouldn't be forced to have to use part of the attempted wall that's still intact in order to attempt to make a new one.

Case 2) Your wall gets in the way of your movement. This is a common case in situations involving a wall and a water shortcut. If we're talking about a wall that walls a city, as long as you're not making a brand new wall with new units that fully walls the city in its place, you should be allowed to move the wall.

Написано Lelouch., 06.05.2020 at 18:43

Написано Witch-Doctor, 06.05.2020 at 18:04

If you remove any wall and place any new wall in it's location, that's rewalling. This is 100% a rewall

Rewalling is when you remove a cap wall and make a new cap wall in its place. For it to be rewalling, the cap wall has to be fully walled the turn before and the fully walled in the turn after. Note that if the wall in question is a big wall that fully walls the cap, then it's fine to make another bigwall in it's place so long as you're not fully walling a country. In other words, you should be able to spam a new wall anywhere on the map each turn so long as it doesn't fully wall a country.

The reason why this definition of a rewall makes sense is because it avoids any and all potential misunderstands that could arise from a rewalling case in question, while also allowing players to replace a wall that's either unfavorable or inconvenient to them. What do I mean by this?

Case 1) Your opponent wfs your cap and it's not fully walled. The player should be allowed to remove the units used to attempt to make a wall and try walling it again the following turn.You shouldn't be forced to have to use part of the attempted wall that's still intact in order to attempt to make a new one.

Case 2) Your wall gets in the way of your movement. This is a common case in situations involving a wall and a water shortcut. If we're talking about a wall that walls a city, as long as you're not making a brand new wall with new units that fully walls the city in its place, you should be allowed to move the wall.

I understand that there's a lot of controversy surrounding the definition of a rewall, because a lot of players don't agree on ONE definition. However, this is just the definition that I agree with because it's the one that I find the most fair.

I know you're slightly stupid so let me explain this slowly.

Rewalling is purposefully MOVING your walling units and then putting a new wall up. When you move your walling unit, the enemy unit sent to wf can completely miss the attack order because the wall units escaped the tb. When you put up a new wall, you are abusing the fact that the wf unit did not attack.

Abusing this and remaining walled the next turn is rewalling, end of discussion.

Now lets talk about the cases you pulled out of thin air.

Case 1). If your cap is wfed then there's no walling. Moving those wfed units DOESNT matter because they ARENT PART OF A WALL. Rewalling is when you MOVE a wall and put a new wall up in it's location.

Case 2). First of all, this is the dumbest argument I've seen this week. So let me explain why
1. If your unit gets in the way of transport (like in greece), you can move the wall unit, move your transport through, THEN CANCEL THE MOVE ORDER AND PUT THE WALL BACK. This is very easy for players who dont play like they have parkinsons disease.
2. We're gonna take the greece example again. Ok cool you move the wall, but that isn't a problem. BECAUSE YOU DIDN'T ADD A NEW WALL, YOU ONLY MOVED THE OLD WALL.

Rewalling is when YOU MOVED THE WALL + Add the new wall to abuse the fact that you can avoid the turnblock of the wfing unit to remain walled for another turn.
If you think this sort of crap is okay, then you better be prepared for some bullshit when I duel you.

Написано Lelouch., 06.05.2020 at 18:43

Написано Witch-Doctor, 06.05.2020 at 18:04

If you remove any wall and place any new wall in it's location, that's rewalling. This is 100% a rewall

Rewalling is when you remove a cap wall and make a new cap wall in its place. For it to be rewalling, the cap wall has to be fully walled the turn before and the fully walled in the turn after. Note that if the wall in question is a big wall that fully walls the cap, then it's fine to make another bigwall in it's place so long as you're not fully walling a country. In other words, you should be able to spam a new wall anywhere on the map each turn so long as it doesn't fully wall a country.

The reason why this definition of a rewall makes sense is because it avoids any and all potential misunderstands that could arise from a rewalling case in question, while also allowing players to replace a wall that's either unfavorable or inconvenient to them. What do I mean by this?

Case 1) Your opponent wfs your cap and it's not fully walled. The player should be allowed to remove the units used to attempt to make a wall and try walling it again the following turn.You shouldn't be forced to have to use part of the attempted wall that's still intact in order to attempt to make a new one.

Case 2) Your wall gets in the way of your movement. This is a common case in situations involving a wall and a water shortcut. If we're talking about a wall that walls a city, as long as you're not making a brand new wall with new units that fully walls the city in its place, you should be allowed to move the wall.

I understand that there's a lot of controversy surrounding the definition of a rewall, because a lot of players don't agree on ONE definition. However, this is just the definition that I agree with because it's the one that I find the most fair.

no one cares what you agree with if the majority says thats a rewall

i can replicate what froyer did 100% of the time and this IT IS a rewall you fag

Написано Lelouch., 06.05.2020 at 18:43

Написано Witch-Doctor, 06.05.2020 at 18:04

If you remove any wall and place any new wall in it's location, that's rewalling. This is 100% a rewall

[Snipped a bunch of false garbage]

"I understand that there's a lot of controversy surrounding the definition of a rewall, because a lot of players don't agree on ONE definition. However, this is just the definition that I agree with because it's the one that I find the most fair"

No lelouch, rewall isnt gender studies, its one concrete thing, and since you are confused ill make this as simple as possible.




This is not a rewall. None of the initial wall units were moved out.
You may know this wall, because we call it a "huarck wall" these days.




This is a rewall. And this is what happened in the froyer SS too.

Wd already said it best:

Rewalling is purposefully MOVING your walling units and then putting a new wall up. When you move your walling unit, the enemy unit sent to wf can completely miss the attack order because the wall units escaped the tb. When you put up a new wall, you are abusing the fact that the wf unit did not attack.
Rewalling is when YOU MOVED THE WALL + Add the new wall to abuse the fact that you can avoid the turnblock of the wfing unit to remain walled for another turn.
If you think this sort of crap is okay, then you better be prepared for some bullshit when I duel you.

Написано 4nic, 06.05.2020 at 19:53

Написано Lelouch., 06.05.2020 at 18:43

Написано Witch-Doctor, 06.05.2020 at 18:04

If you remove any wall and place any new wall in it's location, that's rewalling. This is 100% a rewall

[Snipped a bunch of false garbage]

"I understand that there's a lot of controversy surrounding the definition of a rewall, because a lot of players don't agree on ONE definition. However, this is just the definition that I agree with because it's the one that I find the most fair"

No lelouch, rewall isnt gender studies, its one concrete thing, and since you are confused ill make this as simple as possible.




This is not a rewall. None of the initial wall units were moved out.
You may know this wall, because we call it a "huarck wall" these days.




This is a rewall. And this is what happened in the froyer SS too.

Wd already said it best:

Rewalling is purposefully MOVING your walling units and then putting a new wall up. When you move your walling unit, the enemy unit sent to wf can completely miss the attack order because the wall units escaped the tb. When you put up a new wall, you are abusing the fact that the wf unit did not attack.
Rewalling is when YOU MOVED THE WALL + Add the new wall to abuse the fact that you can avoid the turnblock of the wfing unit to remain walled for another turn.
If you think this sort of crap is okay, then you better be prepared for some bullshit when I duel you.

I see... thanks for the clarification then.

What kind of bullshit is this.

By that logic once you wf a city you can keep wfing it forever because it's inappropiate not to wait to the vecinity to be empty.

Boywind has bullied Froyer in the most disgusting and repulsive way I can imagine and lost fair and square.

Oops u got caught again, why i'm not surprised
ur lil dirty secret became global now

Написано G.R.O.M, 06.05.2020 at 21:23

Oops u got caught again, why i'm not surprised
ur lil dirty secret became global now

G.R.O.M of all people you more than anyone should shut the fuck up

Написано Rock Lee, 06.05.2020 at 21:24

Написано G.R.O.M, 06.05.2020 at 21:23

Oops u got caught again, why i'm not surprised
ur lil dirty secret became global now

G.R.O.M of all people you more than anyone should shut the fuck up

oh really, sorry tell me again who are u sir?

Написано Rock Lee, 06.05.2020 at 21:22

Boywind has bullied Froyer in the most disgusting and repulsive way I can imagine

heh u got that right...

Написано G.R.O.M, 06.05.2020 at 21:26

oh really, sorry tell me again who are u sir?

Sorry brother my blood has heatened

Написано Rock Lee, 06.05.2020 at 21:39

Написано G.R.O.M, 06.05.2020 at 21:26

oh really, sorry tell me again who are u sir?

Sorry brother my blood has heatened

it's ok
I said what i said for a reason.. he was doing this dirty moves so many times against so many players and he denied + accused pro players with things like >> ''random noobs that dont know what a rewall is.'', those noobs are the same ones who teached him and gave him a hand to become a competitive player, and now unfortunately he dont show a minimum respect..
froyer prepare urself for hell bro your sin is not forgiven