Free Extra Cities Option

Extra cities being only for premium should not happen. Extra cities is an option that should be available to the common player who has not bought promo. It is very frustrating seeing that option grayed out. First of all, extra cities are just like a map. Any online map on mapquest will give you extra cities if you zoom in. Why not have an extra cities option for everyone? Secondly, it would improve the game play. I suggest that we add the option of adding extra cities to all players. Then we could host 3 v 3 10k Europe all day freely. The common player should have more rights. Power to the players!

It won't hurt the AtWar economy.
It won't hurt us.
It will make EU 3 v 3 bloodier hehehe.

----

You could simply add the extra cities to the default map, support

But-

Common players in Atwar are not of the competitive faction but of the Role Players. If Free Extra Cities is implemented, I'll be hosting 3v3s non-stop.

I quite dont understand how extra cities makes it harder for western europe, rather the contrary, u get extra income AND(more importantly) extra reinfs.... My view is extra cities unbalances Eur map even further

Написано Kraigg, 26.06.2015 at 11:12

I quite dont understand how extra cities makes it harder for western europe, rather the contrary, u get extra income AND(more importantly) extra reinfs.... My view is extra cities unbalances Eur map even further

exaclty

Написано dinoscout, 26.06.2015 at 16:37

Hey, look at my sexy signature

Support

Support

Написано Diedra, 26.06.2015 at 10:15

Then we could host 3 v 3 10k Europe all day freely. The common player should have more rights. Power to the players!

It won't hurt the AtWar economy.
It won't hurt us.

Well, 1st off, you couldn't do them all day as you say you could: along with adding the extra cities, you would have to allow the option to make team games available for all players as well (otherwise, you can't really do a 3 vs. 3 ).

2nd, the admins have to make money on this game, it took them a long time to make it, with a lot of sweat and effort put into it. Adding these will take away some of the incentive to get premium, and cause a decrease in income for the admins. As it is, the admins can't live off the money from premiums bought by players, they have normal lives (and regular jobs come with that), and have to fix bugs and transfer atWar to HTML5 in past months along-side these. The "atWar economy", as you call it, could indeed be affected by this.

If you're really into 3 vs. 3's, and can't get enough of them, the best thing to do is get into a good, active clan that frequently participates in CW's. This way, you still get the extra cities and team games for EU, while still earning double SP (CW's give 2x SP multipliers every game automatically)

As far as your "power and rights to the players" theme, the admins have to do what's best for atWar and it's players, and that doesn't always include giving rights and power to them.


To summarize: I'm not for support on this

I say make a 3v3 room where the eu and eu+ map has too pre-sets, with extra cities and without extra cities. and just add the other competitive maps to a list of playable maps that you can choose from when hosting, like dreamworld and ancient and every other comp map that people have ever played in a as a 3v3 or cw.
have the max players set to 6 for every game and that cant be changed and then play.

Написано Netre, 29.06.2015 at 09:15

I say make a 3v3 room where the eu and eu+ map has too pre-sets, with extra cities and without extra cities. and just add the other competitive maps to a list of playable maps that you can choose from when hosting, like dreamworld and ancient and every other comp map that people have ever played in a as a 3v3 or cw.
have the max players set to 6 for every game and that cant be changed and then play.

Support if similar is supported for every type of gameplay.

I'd love to play a 20-player FFA on a 20-player FFA map without buying premium.

Написано 12gsh, 28.06.2015 at 18:41

Написано Diedra, 26.06.2015 at 10:15

Then we could host 3 v 3 10k Europe all day freely. The common player should have more rights. Power to the players!

It won't hurt the AtWar economy.
It won't hurt us.

Well, 1st off, you couldn't do them all day as you say you could: along with adding the extra cities, you would have to allow the option to make team games available for all players as well (otherwise, you can't really do a 3 vs. 3 ).

2nd, the admins have to make money on this game, it took them a long time to make it, with a lot of sweat and effort put into it. Adding these will take away some of the incentive to get premium, and cause a decrease in income for the admins. As it is, the admins can't live off the money from premiums bought by players, they have normal lives (and regular jobs come with that), and have to fix bugs and transfer atWar to HTML5 in past months along-side these. The "atWar economy", as you call it, could indeed be affected by this.

If you're really into 3 vs. 3's, and can't get enough of them, the best thing to do is get into a good, active clan that frequently participates in CW's. This way, you still get the extra cities and team games for EU, while still earning double SP (CW's give 2x SP multipliers every game automatically)

As far as your "power and rights to the players" theme, the admins have to do what's best for atWar and it's players, and that doesn't always include giving rights and power to them.


To summarize: I'm not for support on this

First off, it is very easy to organize a team without the extra team set option. Secondly, an admins job is to also make the player's gameplay experience more enjoyable. The happier the players are, the more players they get and the more likely someone is going to support them by buying premium. Well examining the scenario where extra cities are available to every player, we see in this case that the premium still provides an extensive incentive. Who doesn't want to host a 20 player FFA? There are still large perks to premium. Plus people would support them even more with this new ability. You should support this. This is for the common good and for the sake of 3 v 3 EU extra cities.
----

Написано Diedra, 01.07.2015 at 11:46

First off, it is very easy to organize a team without the extra team set option. Secondly, an admins job is to also make the player's gameplay experience more enjoyable. The happier the players are, the more players they get and the more likely someone is going to support them by buying premium. Well examining the scenario where extra cities are available to every player, we see in this case that the premium still provides an extensive incentive. Who doesn't want to host a 20 player FFA? There are still large perks to premium. Plus people would support them even more with this new ability. You should support this. This is for the common good and for the sake of 3 v 3 EU extra cities.

Well, you can't have assurance that people will agree to a team game, too many trolls and such. The only secure way to do it is to include the team option also. I know the admins job is to make it more enjoyable, but it's already good as it is. If they did that, and if their job is to make it more enjoyable, why not just have all premium features available to non-premiums? They have to make money somewhere.

On the last note: this game is fun as it is, without extra cities option available. There are plenty of things to do aside from having that option available. It's obvious you want extra cities option, and you're not premium either, proving my point valid: Having the extra cities option only for premiums gives people like you more incentive to get it. If it wasn't only for premiums, it would take away from premium (even if it's only a little bit, it's still there).

Though a nice thought, I still stick to no support.

Написано 12gsh, 01.07.2015 at 13:23

Написано Diedra, 01.07.2015 at 11:46

First off, it is very easy to organize a team without the extra team set option. Secondly, an admins job is to also make the player's gameplay experience more enjoyable. The happier the players are, the more players they get and the more likely someone is going to support them by buying premium. Well examining the scenario where extra cities are available to every player, we see in this case that the premium still provides an extensive incentive. Who doesn't want to host a 20 player FFA? There are still large perks to premium. Plus people would support them even more with this new ability. You should support this. This is for the common good and for the sake of 3 v 3 EU extra cities.

Well, you can't have assurance that people will agree to a team game, too many trolls and such. The only secure way to do it is to include the team option also. I know the admins job is to make it more enjoyable, but it's already good as it is. If they did that, and if their job is to make it more enjoyable, why not just have all premium features available to non-premiums? They have to make money somewhere.

On the last note: this game is fun as it is, without extra cities option available. There are plenty of things to do aside from having that option available. It's obvious you want extra cities option, and you're not premium either, proving my point valid: Having the extra cities option only for premiums gives people like you more incentive to get it. If it wasn't only for premiums, it would take away from premium (even if it's only a little bit, it's still there).

Though a nice thought, I still stick to no support.

Using logic, we see that we should be able to freely add extra cities. Still there is very little being taken away from premium as you read the long premium list of incentives. The same maps are hosted all day long, adding extra cities would spice it up. Let the competitive spirit of 3 v 3 EU ring out. I have also done some research on you as a player. You could benefit from this too my friend and become better at this game.

----

It's annoying that all tutorials and expansion videos are with extra and I hardly get to play a map with extra.

SuPpOrT but 3v3 wont work with Team OPtions

In a game where you must be premium to have a forum avatar and signature LoL yea good luck with that

Написано Creepy2324_deleted, 15.07.2015 at 14:55

In a game where you must be premium to have a forum avatar and signature LoL yea good luck with that

你惹惹生气。

Why such negative feelings? I feel someone is getting a sense of supremecy. You are not invincible my friend.

Think of how free extra cities would benefit the society as a whole.

Btw, anyone can make a signature without premium.

Support the cause now! ↖(￣▽￣")

----