|
Lots of reading, very quality thread..
Does this mean you think I'm george Clooney?
----
We are not the same- I am a Martian.
Загрузка...
Загрузка...
|
|
I like the idea.
And it's not like any one clan has more then 6 members online at a time anyway (with the exception of those RP clans or SM on occasion).
Notice it is sm that is highly agaist it. With good reason I geuss, they built a dynasty and helly wishes to dismantle it. But maybe rome wouldn't of fallen if it's nobility would if made some sacrifices, no what I mean?
----
We are not the same- I am a Martian.
Загрузка...
Загрузка...
|
|
I could see a cap of like 100 or something.
Загрузка...
Загрузка...
|
|
Написано Helly, 16.02.2016 at 10:50
Lots of reading, very quality thread..
Does this mean you think I'm bill Clooney?
Only if i am that girl next to you.
Загрузка...
Загрузка...
|
|
Написано Exo-K, 15.02.2016 at 19:18
Написано b0nker2, 15.02.2016 at 15:17
The limitations at the moment are that high ranks dont want to play wit low ranks, therefore there needs to be an alternative for low ranks to get used to competitive play whilst still having a link to high ranks to learn.
Doesn't this make it tough to teach low ranks still though? I just think it makes more sense in having players that are same group be same clan instead of more training clans that extremely rarely (some still do though) survive, since if not willing to help the younger generation in AW the game is then kinda doomed isn't it?
You have missed the point though, training clans fail when they operate separately from the mother clan.
They can still in a competitive sense operate as their own entity (scoring etc), however with merged clan features would give them the freedom to get advise from experienced players without experienced players having to risk their own elo in cws
The only way individuals improve is by actually playing and its easier to do that and learn in a non pressured environment.
You cant expect successful clans to sacrifice their success when the reward is only for one individual, it simply isnt worth it.
Загрузка...
Загрузка...
|
|
Написано Helly, 16.02.2016 at 10:52
I like the idea.
And it's not like any one clan has more then 6 members online at a time anyway (with the exception of those RP clans or SM on occasion).
Notice it is sm that is highly agaist it. With good reason I geuss, they built a dynasty and helly wishes to dismantle it. But maybe rome wouldn't of fallen if it's nobility would if made some sacrifices, no what I mean?
The irony, gets mad when bonker kicks people, suggest cap limits on clan members
I do love you hellraiser.
Загрузка...
Загрузка...
|
|
Написано b0nker2, 16.02.2016 at 14:58
Написано Helly, 16.02.2016 at 10:52
I like the idea.
And it's not like any one clan has more then 6 members online at a time anyway (with the exception of those RP clans or SM on occasion).
Notice it is sm that is highly agaist it. With good reason I geuss, they built a dynasty and helly wishes to dismantle it. But maybe rome wouldn't of fallen if it's nobility would if made some sacrifices, no what I mean?
The irony, gets mad when bonker kicks people, suggest cap limits on clan members
I do love you hellraiser.
As time goes by you get older and wiser to the world and you learn how things really are. I did apologize didn't i? Things have changed and so have i.
----
We are not the same- I am a Martian.
Загрузка...
Загрузка...
|
|
I am playing another game, where basically the number of member directly and proportionnaly influences the score u get, ie having inactive members heavily penalizes you. How could we implement something similar?
----
Seule la victoire est belle
Загрузка...
Загрузка...
|
|
Написано b0nker2, 14.02.2016 at 12:44
clovis ramblings
Clovis look at ours and MKs member list, then you will realise that both clans built their own reputations and ranked up together.
SM and MK actually all of the established clans built themselves, new clans need to also, We are like the Real Madrid and Barca, it is up to other clans to organise and challenge us
Excuse me? Syndi > mk. Bitchpls
Загрузка...
Загрузка...
|
|
Написано Exo-K, 15.02.2016 at 05:29
Why not just have clans like MK SM ect train more low ranks? I know they did for a bit (unsure if still do) and they can have their trained low ranks fight the others trained low ranks still few clans maybe but training players means more comp players and possibly in the future more comp clans? and in the short term it's at least more clan wars
dbacks, bertank, goblin, xeno, hell, soul, vdog, leaf, xeno, waffel* me, and even bonker himself are products of sm low rank training.
Загрузка...
Загрузка...
|
|
Написано Waffel, 17.02.2016 at 13:45
Написано b0nker2, 14.02.2016 at 12:44
clovis ramblings
Clovis look at ours and MKs member list, then you will realise that both clans built their own reputations and ranked up together.
SM and MK actually all of the established clans built themselves, new clans need to also, We are like the Real Madrid and Barca, it is up to other clans to organise and challenge us
Excuse me? Syndi > mk. Bitchpls
You let syndicate die sha me on you.
----
We are not the same- I am a Martian.
Загрузка...
Загрузка...
|
|
I come back after weeks and i have 15 notifications... you been demoted, you been promoted, you been demoted, you been promoted...
DAMN SM ARISTOCRATIC BUREAUCRATS!!!!
----
Загрузка...
Загрузка...
|
|
Написано Helly, 17.02.2016 at 15:46
Написано Waffel, 17.02.2016 at 13:45
Написано b0nker2, 14.02.2016 at 12:44
clovis ramblings
Clovis look at ours and MKs member list, then you will realise that both clans built their own reputations and ranked up together.
SM and MK actually all of the established clans built themselves, new clans need to also, We are like the Real Madrid and Barca, it is up to other clans to organise and challenge us
Excuse me? Syndi > mk. Bitchpls
You let syndicate die sha me on you.
I did? Lel, if it wasn't for me syndicate would've died already in 2014 or maybe even before.
BUT THANKS! <3
Загрузка...
Загрузка...
|