Cost efficiency

Stop saying that the imp milita is the most cost efficient unit...

You never consider the RANGE of the unit in this equation, its efficiency is only on paper.

but in a real game you will find out that the HW milita and the GW milita are far superior.

k bye.

Написано 4nic, 28.01.2018 at 09:33

Stop saying that the imp milita is the most cost efficient unit...

You never consider the RANGE of the unit in this equation, its efficiency is only on paper.

but in a real game you will find out that the HW milita and the GW milita are far superior.

k bye.

Who saied that?

Also agree GW militai are superior.Pd has nice militai too.

Написано 4nic, 28.01.2018 at 09:33

Stop saying that the imp milita is the most cost efficient unit...

You never consider the RANGE of the unit in this equation, its efficiency is only on paper.

but in a real game you will find out that the HW milita and the GW milita are far superior.

k bye.

cost efficiency and usefulness are two different things 4dic....... imp militia are still most cost efficient

Написано Checkmate., 28.01.2018 at 12:56

Написано 4nic, 28.01.2018 at 09:33

Stop saying that the imp milita is the most cost efficient unit...

You never consider the RANGE of the unit in this equation, its efficiency is only on paper.

but in a real game you will find out that the HW milita and the GW milita are far superior.

k bye.

cost efficiency and usefulness are two different things 4dic....... imp militia are still most cost efficient

They're not. Efficiency can't be based off one variable.

Написано Wheelo, 28.01.2018 at 13:22

Написано Checkmate., 28.01.2018 at 12:56

Написано 4nic, 28.01.2018 at 09:33

Stop saying that the imp milita is the most cost efficient unit...

You never consider the RANGE of the unit in this equation, its efficiency is only on paper.

but in a real game you will find out that the HW milita and the GW milita are far superior.

k bye.

cost efficiency and usefulness are two different things 4dic....... imp militia are still most cost efficient

They're not. Efficiency can't be based off one variable.

cost efficiency has always been based off of the hp, att, and def. range is not included.

Написано Checkmate., 28.01.2018 at 14:13

Написано Wheelo, 28.01.2018 at 13:22

Написано Checkmate., 28.01.2018 at 12:56

Написано 4nic, 28.01.2018 at 09:33

Stop saying that the imp milita is the most cost efficient unit...

You never consider the RANGE of the unit in this equation, its efficiency is only on paper.

but in a real game you will find out that the HW milita and the GW milita are far superior.

k bye.

cost efficiency and usefulness are two different things 4dic....... imp militia are still most cost efficient

They're not. Efficiency can't be based off one variable.

cost efficiency has always been based off of the hp, att, and def. range is not included.

No, that's called a bias measurement. You can't ignore certain variables and consider others, it leads to inaccuracy.

Написано Checkmate., 28.01.2018 at 14:13

Написано Wheelo, 28.01.2018 at 13:22

Написано Checkmate., 28.01.2018 at 12:56

Написано 4nic, 28.01.2018 at 09:33

Stop saying that the imp milita is the most cost efficient unit...

You never consider the RANGE of the unit in this equation, its efficiency is only on paper.

but in a real game you will find out that the HW milita and the GW milita are far superior.

k bye.

cost efficiency and usefulness are two different things 4dic....... imp militia are still most cost efficient

They're not. Efficiency can't be based off one variable.

cost efficiency has always been based off of the hp, att, and def. range is not included.

every single stat has to be measured, from range, to critical and collateral damage for it to be accurate.

Range isnt a measurement of cost....

Написано Permamuted, 28.01.2018 at 17:07

Range isnt a measurement of cost....

wow someone who is not a monkey <3

Написано Permamuted, 28.01.2018 at 17:07

Range isnt a measurement of cost....

But the post is about cost efficiency,not the cost....