Buffing NC suggestion

Since RA, MOS, SM, Blitz all got buffed, can we take a look at buffing NC? I feel that NC is getting power-creeped and needs a little buff.

I think a good buff for NC is to reduce their marine cost by an additional 30.
This would give NC a slight buff that it needs to stay relevant.

With this, NC marines will cost 120 which is as much as tanks. This would give NC a more viable ground attack unit than NC tanks which are god-awful. I also think buffing NC marines also fits the theme of naval commander. Marines sync well with NC submarines and people think of marines as a "naval operations" kind of unit.

I am lelouch and I approve this message

We already have enough strats for stealths, need a missile unit for ships to carry and fire!!!!

Написано sirivann, 15.01.2021 at 22:23

We already have enough strats for stealths, need a missile unit for ships to carry and fire!!!!

GW, MOS. HW

3/13 strat is too much? Besides this won't make NC a stealth strat. It's still primarily an infantry/ship spam strat with stealth as an option.

Noice

Написано Witch-Doctor, 15.01.2021 at 22:24

Написано sirivann, 15.01.2021 at 22:23

We already have enough strats for stealths, need a missile unit for ships to carry and fire!!!!

GW, MOS.

2/13 strat is too much? Besides this won't make NC a stealth strat. It's still primarily an infantry/ship spam strat with stealth as an option.

and CO , thats 3 strats specificly designed for stealths, we need missilesssssss launched by nc shipssssssssss

Can we at least get IF militia 1 range just enough to wall lol

Написано Richthofen, 15.01.2021 at 23:49

Can we at least get IF militia 1 range just enough to wall lol

Evet

Написано Xenomega, 16.01.2021 at 10:09

Just add rivers to world map that connect to some capitals then you could use some destroyers to attack inland

give macho men unit that can carry 1 range ships over lands like vikings did !!!

Just add aircraft carrier (same unit like in ww2) to nc and close this topic forever.

Yeah aircraft carrier, or perhaps add the aircraft carrier to a separate strategy

Написано Tribune Aquila, 16.01.2021 at 17:43

Yeah aircraft carrier, or perhaps add the aircraft carrier to a separate strategy

I 100% support

Add HP to NC ships.

To be honest, aircraft carriers would be a good idea. It would also be a buff to strats to Aerial Defender.

Support

I really don't see the need to buff Marines.

If we all want to buff NC by giving a bit more ground strenght, than let's just make Tanks less awful.

Написано Estus, 18.01.2021 at 21:17

I really don't see the need to buff Marines.

If we all want to buff NC by giving a bit more ground strenght, than let's just make Tanks less awful.

Marines are usually associated with naval operations, not tanks. It's more thematic to the strategy

Написано Witch-Doctor, 18.01.2021 at 21:19

Marines are usually associated with naval operations, not tanks. It's more thematic to the strategy

That depends, NC still a naval-oriented Strategy afterall.

Cheaper Marines would also make NC mobility even higher considering the huge amount of upgrades that they have.

Написано Estus, 18.01.2021 at 21:26

Написано Witch-Doctor, 18.01.2021 at 21:19

Marines are usually associated with naval operations, not tanks. It's more thematic to the strategy

That depends, NC still a naval-oriented Strategy afterall.

Cheaper Marines would also make NC mobility even higher considering the huge amount of upgrades that they have.

The mobility is still the same considering 90% of your army is infantry, 8% transports, 2% others.
Marines don't go any further than infantry and transport.

Написано Witch-Doctor, 18.01.2021 at 21:19

Написано Estus, 18.01.2021 at 21:17

I really don't see the need to buff Marines.

If we all want to buff NC by giving a bit more ground strenght, than let's just make Tanks less awful.

Marines are usually associated with naval operations, not tanks. It's more thematic to the strategy

navy deploys all forces even tanks... xd

Написано sirivann, 19.01.2021 at 00:13

Написано Witch-Doctor, 18.01.2021 at 21:19

Написано Estus, 18.01.2021 at 21:17

I really don't see the need to buff Marines.

If we all want to buff NC by giving a bit more ground strenght, than let's just make Tanks less awful.

Marines are usually associated with naval operations, not tanks. It's more thematic to the strategy

navy deploys all forces even tanks... xd

In what nation does the navy utilizes tanks?

Написано Richthofen, 19.01.2021 at 00:30

In what nation does the navy utilizes tanks?

Most of them.

Написано Estus, 19.01.2021 at 02:14

Написано Richthofen, 19.01.2021 at 00:30

In what nation does the navy utilizes tanks?

Most of them.

Most military uses structures. Majority of land vehicles are operated and utilized within all armies. The only time any navy have tanks are to transport them.
The Deutsches Heer operates and owns all tanks. The deutches marine doesn't have a single tank in its inventory. But doesn't mean the marine transport then.

Same goes for the us navy. No tanks in its inventory nor operates but can carry army tanks overseas.

Написано Richthofen, 19.01.2021 at 00:30

Написано sirivann, 19.01.2021 at 00:13

Написано Witch-Doctor, 18.01.2021 at 21:19

Написано Estus, 18.01.2021 at 21:17

I really don't see the need to buff Marines.

If we all want to buff NC by giving a bit more ground strenght, than let's just make Tanks less awful.

Marines are usually associated with naval operations, not tanks. It's more thematic to the strategy

navy deploys all forces even tanks... xd

In what nation does the navy utilizes tanks?

da fuck u think all tanks are just brought via plane??? xDDD

Написано Richthofen, 19.01.2021 at 03:01

Написано Estus, 19.01.2021 at 02:14

Написано Richthofen, 19.01.2021 at 00:30

In what nation does the navy utilizes tanks?

Most of them.

Most military uses structures. Majority of land vehicles are operated and utilized within all armies. The only time any navy have tanks are to transport them.
The Deutsches Heer operates and owns all tanks. The deutches marine doesn't have a single tank in its inventory. But doesn't mean the marine transport then.

Same goes for the us navy. No tanks in its inventory nor operates but can carry army tanks overseas.

thats why i said deploy nigga