Player statistics reloaded (Apr-2013)

Hello all,
again some stats on the players in-game performance.
Top 50 players and updated to 06.04.2013.

I. General player stats
Includes: Position, Player Name, Rank, SP, ELO, REP, Date of registry, Games (played, lost, won and abandoned), Games won per accounted, Games lost per accounted, Turns played, PvP battles (total, won and lost), SP per (game played, game won and game accounted).



II. Graphs

(a) SP per...



(b) Games (lost, won and abandoned)



(c) Games acconted (won and lost)



(d) PvP battles (won and lost)



III. SP vs ELO



IV. SP growth (top 20; from 13.01. to 06.04.2013; including off-game SPs)







Cheers,
CD

Another stat that I wanted to include (thnx learster for the hint!):

Players aggressiveness (PvP Battles per turn):



Cheers,
CD

Nice stats brian got such an SP boost cause he got premium

I feel so aggressive now...

Dat fsm sp growth

Написано Homero, 07.04.2013 at 03:21

I feel so aggressive now...

Aggressive yes! But not as effective (in terms of PvP battles) as Safari or Puma...

Написано nonames, 07.04.2013 at 06:45

Dat fsm sp growth

Sure, this issue makes it necessary to diferentiate between in-game and off-game SPs.
If we clear the SP from the off-game SPs (through the invitation system) the FSM would have now 517.937 SP (instead of 955.604 SP) and his growth rate between January and April would have been of 14,67% (instead of 111,56%).

Cheers,
CD

Check Sultan going up lol
I like the stats, cool you keep uploading them!

Написано Hugosch, 08.04.2013 at 07:35

Check Sultan going up lol
I like the stats, cool you keep uploading them!

I'll keep going on with these stats... as long as people wish to have them.
But, players should be commenting on their interpretations of the stats... like "Homero is an aggressive player but not as efficient as Safari" or "learster finishes a game (usually winning!) and does not care for the abandon option"... etc. It says a lot about the players style...

Cheers,
CD

Написано Columna Durruti, 08.04.2013 at 07:41

like "Homero is an aggressive player but not as efficient as Safari" (...) It says a lot about the players style...

I don't think it has much to do with efficiency, to me it only means Safari is picking his fights better than others. To reach such a high amount of battles/turn I assume Homero often faces more than one enemy at the same time, which takes a lot off the ability to pick your fights and thus winning them.
Let's say you battle three enemies at the same time, naturally you will loose more often to them than you would if it was only one guy of the same size as the three together. If only for that they have three "first moves" and you only one.
So yes, it probably says more about the playstyle than efficiency.