Master Of Stealth and Guerilla Warfare

I don't know what to save for, and apparently both are kind of similar, with MoS being cheaper.

Help me decide and give a reason why you pick either MoS or GW. Thanks!

You should firstly unlock GW. Save your sps for it.

Definitely GW!

Написано Columna Durruti, 24.06.2013 at 07:45

Definitely GW!

Why? O.o

Написано zelaznog_22, 24.06.2013 at 07:55

Написано Columna Durruti, 24.06.2013 at 07:45

Definitely GW!

Why? O.o

Actually it depends what your gaming preferences are.
For Worldgames +15k starting funds, then MoS may be more suitable than GW, considering that you need a fast expansion to have the required fundings for the army you are considering to build.
Otherwise, if you are planning to play EU games with limited starting funds, then definetively GW is OP: cheap marines, and boosted militia (+1 att, +1 def, +2 HP and +2 range). The downside of GW are the transport units. Thats why GW is good in 2 cases: low income environments and/or low range battlefields (EU, for instance).

For my gaming options GW > MoS.

Personally I prefer playing with MoS all the time, but in small maps with less income, GW is definitely superior to MoS, but I'm just the person who likes to strike my enemies when they least expect it.

I've already decided to just get MoS when I get 400 more sp as I play on world maps more. Thanks for the info guys!

GW for me.

MoS
I find it more suitable with my gameplay

What about EU +, what do you guys think? GW or MoS?

Написано Prey, 08.07.2013 at 09:17

What about EU +, what do you guys think? GW or MoS?

Most certainly GW.

I cannot play GW in world games. Gimme MoS asap kthx

MoS > GW

It pretty much depends on which maps you play.

If you prefer smaller maps like Europe, then GW is more usefull. In worldmaps, i would go for MoS.

You could do what Hugosch said but GW is way better if you are starting out small in a world map. MoS not really that good if you don't make much money.